Skip to content
← AI Act: overview of provisions

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act) · Chapter III · High-risk AI systems

Article 18 · Documentation keeping

Text

  1. The provider shall, for a period ending 10 years after the high-risk AI system has been placed on the market or put into service, keep at the disposal of the national competent authorities:

(a)

the technical documentation referred to in Article 11;

(b)

the documentation concerning the quality management system referred to in Article 17;

(c)

the documentation concerning the changes approved by notified bodies, where applicable;

(d)

the decisions and other documents issued by the notified bodies, where applicable;

(e)

the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47.

  1. Each Member State shall determine conditions under which the documentation referred to in paragraph 1 remains at the disposal of the national competent authorities for the period indicated in that paragraph for the cases when a provider or its authorised representative established on its territory goes bankrupt or ceases its activity prior to the end of that period.

  2. Providers that are financial institutions subject to requirements regarding their internal governance, arrangements or processes under Union financial services law shall maintain the technical documentation as part of the documentation kept under the relevant Union financial services law.

Text: Official Journal of the EU, 12 July 2024. No consolidated version reflecting Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 has been issued yet.

Commentary

The technical documentation, the QMS documentation, the declaration of conformity and the certificates kept available to the authorities for ten years after the system is placed on the market.

How content is made

Content is produced in the Legal To Code legal workflow for Claude Code (version 1.131.0). Cited provisions are verified against a local library of their verbatim wording. Where the wording is not in the library, it is verified in the Czech Collection of Laws. For case-law research the workflow is connected to the Salvia MCP server. Automated checks of citations and internal consistency are part of the workflow. Even those checks do not rule out an error. Verify decisive information against the original sources.

How this works · What has changed